Search run analysis for @willoremus from Tue, May 15, 2018 at 17:45:27 -0700 (logged in) Click here for a guided tour of this page.

totalRepliesActual=5

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996470591472390144, from: @jeffjohnroberts (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:21:17(HIGH,0,0,1) Hmmm. Nudity and graphic violence are easy to identify. Hate speech is subjective. I don't know I'd want an AI system that catches 100% of hate speech — that would likely mean living in a dictatorship]
[tweet: 996486291763085312, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:23:40(HIGH,0,1,0) Yeah, the stats weren't meant as an indictment. Just found them interesting.]
[tweet: 996540280881995777, from: @cryptopopsicle (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:58:12(HIGH,0,0,0) Hate Speech is Free Speech]
[tweet: 996532774172614659, from: @jazzynaturist (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:28:22(HIGH,0,0,0) the fact we’re more concerned about mere nudity well, that about says it all #bodyacceptance]
[tweet: 996518224010334208, from: @maxrieper (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:30:33(HIGH,0,0,0) pic.twitter.com/wnO5fu61I9]

totalReplies=4

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
Hmmm. Nudity and graphic violence are easy to identify. Hate speech is subjective. I don't know I'd want an AI system that catches 100% of hate speech — that would likely mean living in a dictatorship
 ranking=13.958516303883599 from {pop=1.61, coleman=0.57, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.22, smog=0.77, ari=0.22, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=3.00, kincaid=0.22, fog=0.35}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
Yeah, the stats weren't meant as an indictment. Just found them interesting.
 ranking=9.344431101701476 from {coleman=0.68, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.19, pop=0.69, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.22, ari=0.24, lix=0, time=1.60, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=2, rank=2, date=2
the fact we’re more concerned about mere nudity
well, that about says it all
#bodyacceptance
 ranking=8.060542092851069 from {coleman=0.70, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.34, cos=0.49, smog=0.85, ari=0.47, lix=0, time=0.80, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.38, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.42}
 orders: orig=4, rank=3, date=4
Hate Speech is Free Speech
 ranking=0.10896789175199262 from {coleman=0.51, cos=1.48, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.09, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.83, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.40, numword=0, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.10}
 orders: orig=3, rank=4, date=5
pic.twitter.com/wnO5fu61I9
 ranking=-11.8 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=1.20, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=5, rank=5, date=3

totalRepliesActual=9

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996550553160306689, from: @goodgirlcrystal (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 05:39:01(HIGH,0,0,0) they already do this on gossip blogs]
[tweet: 996503115611496450, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:30:31(HIGH,0,0,0) https://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/361605070049120256?s=19 …]
[tweet: 996502790800334849, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:29:14(HIGH,1,0,0) Bigger than gaming the system.. .. This is DNA, billions of people.. .https://twitter.com/profhamel/status/851573957127884800?s=19 …]
[tweet: 996497399496560642, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:07:48(HIGH,0,0,0) Your company, your leadership everything in the light.... Adds pressure to perform, execute.. .  Its the crowd that really controls the narrative...bottom up ....  Trump tries to fight that energy with force....boomerangs back.  E=MC (squared)]
[tweet: 996494038814556160, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:54:27(HIGH,1,0,0) They'll customize @kanyewest's life, Kanye won't even know...  #NewSlave reverse. Fame is overrated in the coming era.https://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/869226551308693505?s=19 …]
[tweet: 996492747048718336, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:49:19(HIGH,1,0,0) Whether Kanye burns in hell forever, or whether his controversial art  generates conversation.. Twitter will drive revenue. Kanye is the product.https://twitter.com/jack/status/984980262915211264?s=19 …]
[tweet: 996491323116019712, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:43:40(HIGH,1,0,0) In end, $Twtr is a public company, they will try to create a service that drives revenue.   But don't let that stop you from creating your own reality. #Lovetwitter can't stop you from that. We also use the tool/medium to shape ourselves & our environmenthttps://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/707645979252682754?s=19 …]
[tweet: 996462192412254208, from: @kcoxdc (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:47:54(HIGH,1,2,1) I mean, mobs have been mass-reporting victims to get *victims* suspended from Twitter for ages, so... yeah.]
[tweet: 996497811758899201, from: @femiabodunde (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:09:27(HIGH,1,0,0) Works both ways...especially now. As people get more comfortable with the platform....]

totalReplies=8

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
In end, $Twtr is a public company, they will try to create a service that drives revenue. 

But don't let that stop you from creating your own reality. #Lovetwitter can't stop you from that. We also use the tool/medium to shape ourselves & our environmenthttps://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/707645979252682754?s=19 …
 ranking=14.74181542873561 from {pop=1.10, coleman=0.42, numsent=5.00, flesch=1.11, cos=0.19, smog=0.65, ari=0.10, lix=0, time=1.78, numword=4.00, kincaid=0.14, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=7, rank=1, date=2
Whether Kanye burns in hell forever, or whether his controversial art  generates conversation.. Twitter will drive revenue. Kanye is the product.https://twitter.com/jack/status/984980262915211264?s=19 …
 ranking=13.859182900066862 from {coleman=0.88, cos=0, smog=0.93, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.40, pop=1.10, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.49, ari=0.44, lix=0.09, time=1.56, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.52}
 orders: orig=6, rank=2, date=3
Your company, your leadership everything in the light....
Adds pressure to perform, execute.. .

Its the crowd that really controls the narrative...bottom up .... 
Trump tries to fight that energy with force....boomerangs back.

E=MC (squared)
 ranking=12.923261742323039 from {coleman=0.61, cos=0, smog=0.72, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.16, numsent=5.00, flesch=1.16, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=1.11, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=4, rank=3, date=5
I mean, mobs have been mass-reporting victims to get *victims* suspended from Twitter for ages, so... yeah.
 ranking=12.265322274788 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0, smog=0.30, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.31, pop=2.48, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.20, ari=0.34, lix=0.07, time=2.00, numword=1.00, fuzzy=2.30, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=8, rank=4, date=1
They'll customize @kanyewest's life, Kanye won't even know...

#NewSlave reverse.
Fame is overrated in the coming era.https://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/869226551308693505?s=19 …
 ranking=11.287238315581895 from {coleman=0.52, cos=0.26, smog=0.75, jac=0.40, kincaid=0.17, pop=1.10, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.20, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=1.33, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.10, fog=0.36}
 orders: orig=5, rank=5, date=4
Bigger than gaming the system.. ..
This is DNA, billions of people.. .https://twitter.com/profhamel/status/851573957127884800?s=19 …
 ranking=9.49889778155034 from {coleman=0.55, cos=0.37, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.13, pop=1.10, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.14, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=0.67, numword=1.00, fuzzy=2.00, fog=0.11}
 orders: orig=3, rank=6, date=7
Works both ways...especially now. As people get more comfortable with the platform....
 ranking=8.967149850432783 from {coleman=0.63, cos=0.34, smog=0.69, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.08, pop=1.10, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.06, ari=0.20, lix=0, time=0.89, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=9, rank=7, date=6
they already do this on gossip blogs
 ranking=4.453115079365079 from {coleman=0.47, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.09, cos=0, smog=0.30, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=0.22, numword=0, kincaid=0.12, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.14}
 orders: orig=1, rank=8, date=9
https://twitter.com/FemiAbodunde/status/361605070049120256?s=19 …
 ranking=-1.5555555555555556 from {coleman=0, numsent=1.00, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, time=0.44, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=2, rank=9, date=8

totalRepliesActual=1

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996454883543810049, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:18:52, reply to 996454171996971009 from  (UNKNOWN,2,2,0) As @mathbabedotorg taught us, the worst algorithms are (1) large-scale, (2) damaging, (3) opaque. This is at least two of the three. The saving grace may be that it's not that damaging. Your tweets still show up as normal to your followers, and can still be found by others.]

totalReplies=1

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
As @mathbabedotorg taught us, the worst algorithms are (1) large-scale, (2) damaging, (3) opaque. This is at least two of the three. The saving grace may be that it's not that damaging. Your tweets still show up as normal to your followers, and can still be found by others.
 ranking=38.180897867890515 from {coleman=0.38, smog=0.85, jac=0.50, kincaid=0.19, jrw=0.50, pop=2.30, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.12, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=4.00, fuzzy=21.80, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1

totalRepliesActual=1

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996454883543810049, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:18:52(HIGH,2,2,0) As @mathbabedotorg taught us, the worst algorithms are (1) large-scale, (2) damaging, (3) opaque. This is at least two of the three. The saving grace may be that it's not that damaging. Your tweets still show up as normal to your followers, and can still be found by others.]

totalReplies=1

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
As @mathbabedotorg taught us, the worst algorithms are (1) large-scale, (2) damaging, (3) opaque. This is at least two of the three. The saving grace may be that it's not that damaging. Your tweets still show up as normal to your followers, and can still be found by others.
 ranking=17.535897867890515 from {coleman=0.38, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.19, pop=2.30, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.12, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=4.00, fuzzy=1.70, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1

totalRepliesActual=8

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996422627517321216, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:10:41(UNKNOWN,58,77,31) I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp]
[tweet: 996453844937666560, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:14:44, reply to 996420398081130497 from  (UNKNOWN,30,68,6) I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory."  Twitter is... not calling it that.  https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O]
[tweet: 996523937369649152, from: @dadlibertarian (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:53:15(HIGH,0,1,0) So when somebody unleashes their flying monkeys to attack somebody, instead of tweeting to them, they'll all mute and block that person, and they'll be in jail for having an unpopular opinion. Good job, Twitter!]
[tweet: 996480664697495558, from: @horuskii (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:01:18(HIGH,0,1,0) “We assume.” That seems like a best practice.]
[tweet: 996455172426563584, from: @hyperion5182 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:20:01(LOW,0,2,0) Its called Shadowbanning. Twitter has been doing it for years.  I’m about ready to delete this account and make an account i dont actually tweet on and follow news stuff.]
[tweet: 996551853599944705, from: @jayinthepnw (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 05:44:11(LOW,0,0,0) just another form of shadowban, but why am I typing this, you won't see it]
[tweet: 996462946862682118, from: @svegetax (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:50:54(LOW,0,0,0) This will be easy to bot.  Target said subject="****"; Copy said positive replyRT "list"; enable(positiveQuoteAI);  //Loops above command and replicates Loop() {  Block positive replyRT "user";  Make new Bot account wName "****";  Copy positive replyRT "list"; EndLoop()  }]
[tweet: 996482179743010818, from: @its_all__fake (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:07:20(LOW,0,0,0) Everyone sees readily how ripe for abuse this is right?]

totalReplies=93

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory." 
Twitter is... not calling it that. 
https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O
 ranking=22.85966744576697 from {coleman=0.73, smog=0.69, jac=0.50, kincaid=0.27, jrw=0.50, pop=5.55, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.33, ari=0.30, lix=0.11, time=1.75, numword=1.00, fuzzy=7.85, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp
 ranking=13.703251265329676 from {pop=6.18, coleman=0.48, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.10, cos=0.91, smog=0.30, ari=0.27, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.20, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1
Its called Shadowbanning. Twitter has been doing it for years.

I’m about ready to delete this account and make an account i dont actually tweet on and follow news stuff.
 ranking=12.748894664139582 from {coleman=0.57, cos=0.59, smog=0.62, kincaid=0.20, pop=1.39, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.17, ari=0.26, lix=0, time=1.50, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=5, rank=3, date=3
This will be easy to bot.

Target said subject="****";
Copy said positive replyRT "list";
enable(positiveQuoteAI);

//Loops above command and replicates
Loop()
{
 Block positive replyRT "user";
 Make new Bot account wName "****";
 Copy positive replyRT "list";
EndLoop()
 }
 ranking=12.055410982463084 from {coleman=0.80, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.52, cos=0.18, smog=1.17, ari=0.65, lix=0.10, time=1.25, numword=3.00, kincaid=0.55, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.64}
 orders: orig=7, rank=4, date=4
So when somebody unleashes their flying monkeys to attack somebody, instead of tweeting to them, they'll all mute and block that person, and they'll be in jail for having an unpopular opinion. Good job, Twitter!
 ranking=11.848728246346335 from {coleman=0.61, cos=0.55, smog=1.17, kincaid=0.45, pop=0.69, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.41, ari=0.46, lix=0.07, time=0.50, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.63}
 orders: orig=3, rank=5, date=7
Everyone sees readily how ripe for abuse this is right?
 ranking=6.330257557505165 from {coleman=0.54, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.22, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.24, lix=0, time=0.75, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.24, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=8, rank=6, date=6
just another form of shadowban, but why am I typing this, you won't see it
 ranking=6.3013359549557695 from {coleman=0.32, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.22, cos=0, smog=1.07, ari=0.17, lix=0, time=0.25, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.29, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=6, rank=7, date=8
“We assume.” That seems like a best practice.
 ranking=5.7298596805599455 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.04, pop=0.69, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.03, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=1.00, numword=0, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=4, rank=8, date=5

totalRepliesActual=0

_sourcetweets=


totalReplies=0

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=

totalRepliesActual=0

_sourcetweets=


totalReplies=0

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=

totalRepliesActual=32

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996422627517321216, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:10:41, reply to 996420398081130497 from  (UNKNOWN,58,78,31) I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp]
[tweet: 996453844937666560, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:14:44(HIGH,31,69,6) I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory."  Twitter is... not calling it that.  https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O]
[tweet: 996426633417457666, from: @woodtang (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:26:36(HIGH,4,37,5) Do you think this introduces the opportunity for mischief? Say like if people gang up and block/mute/report an account they don’t like?]
[tweet: 996428240683225088, from: @drahcir_rahl (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:32:59(HIGH,1,6,1) Exactly. This is why the bot crackdown. Unfortunately I doubt it was all that effective.]
[tweet: 996457091182166016, from: @jimyoull (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:27:38(HIGH,0,5,1) It’ll be a mess. Love Del but ... how can there be a coherent conversation when some voices are randomly muted. Twitter has a knack for finding the worst possible “solution” to complicated problems]
[tweet: 996457817115627520, from: @drahcir_rahl (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:30:31(HIGH,0,1,0) Yeah we just went through a stint where two people in a thread months old were shadowbanned and it was total pain in the a...]
[tweet: 996428164283985920, from: @dominiclopresti (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:32:41(HIGH,0,19,0) This will have no drawbacks whatsoever]
[tweet: 996483154042064896, from: @davidcovucci (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:11:12(HIGH,0,2,0) but what if you are sending geraldos to @elongreen]
[tweet: 996452514198380544, from: @myboy_pepper (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:09:27(HIGH,0,2,0) Twitter needs to go back to the basics and restructure their reporting process. Tough words in Oct. & still no changes. Reports continuously ignored or consequences minimal. Users of twitter work harder to remove racism than twitter itself. What say u @jack??]
[tweet: 996519720026337281, from: @danmkervick (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:36:30(HIGH,0,0,0) So in other words, tweets that generate lots of approvals and hearts from the amen chorus are OK. Those that provoke angry resentment and consternation are bad.]
[tweet: 996451097765122050, from: @0knaomi (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:03:49(HIGH,9,25,4) so let's get this straight, if a Jewish woman gets blocked by five nazis and two nazis also report her, the robit will assume she is, in fact, the baddie?https://twitter.com/WillOremus/status/996422627517321216 …]
[tweet: 996491521196199938, from: @puellavulnerata (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:44:27(HIGH,2,14,0) so if I register a million sockpuppets just to block my enemies, I'll be the queen of twitter!]
[tweet: 996440583282438146, from: @zaron5551 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:22:02(HIGH,1,4,0) empowering trolls, it's not like all blocks/reports are in good faith]
[tweet: 996470514032959489, from: @100million5 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:20:58(HIGH,0,1,0) Reported]
[tweet: 996510096019656704, from: @queerrain (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:58:15(HIGH,0,0,0) Or you could just, I dunno, hire people to review content and determine if it's harmful based on context.]
[tweet: 996440644062187522, from: @davidmands (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:22:17(HIGH,0,9,1) Ha ha ha what could go wrong. Zero potential for unintended consequences here right? We have block and mute buttons its all the perpetually offended need. @Twitter stop trying to police thought it cant be done.]
[tweet: 996426157703680000, from: @not_mqrk (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:24:43(LOW,6,18,2) What if the content was accurate and politely articulated, but created a negative reaction because people don't like hearing the truth?  This is an awful algorithm. This will just forward confirmation bias and exasperate the existing echo chambers.]
[tweet: 996445634654715904, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:42:07(LOW,0,2,1) That's a legit concern, but note that they're applying this tool to a whole account based on all its interactions, not just a single tweet. So you'd have to be generating overwhelmingly negative responses with almost everything you tweet.]
[tweet: 996452588613648385, from: @not_mqrk (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:09:44(LOW,0,1,0) This is by proportion, right?  So it would be harder to discredit an account with 1,000 followers that has lots of tweets and shares, etc. then say an account with 15 followers and 2 tweets?]
[tweet: 996460096753369088, from: @avafremont (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:39:35(LOW,2,4,0) So,  before,  blocking a user was an act of control over what you experienced.  Now it is an act of control over what everyone else experiences.]
[tweet: 996434262730604544, from: @jltorso (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:56:55(LOW,1,3,0) Begun, the blocking wars have.]
[tweet: 996440805052239874, from: @thai_bill (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:22:55(LOW,0,2,0) Twitter should stop fucking interfering, every change they make, makes twitter worse.]
[tweet: 996517288852549632, from: @timmansplainsit (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:26:50(LOW,0,1,0) Sooooooooo... Shadowbanning then.]
[tweet: 996451707390394368, from: @emperoraxe (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:06:14(LOW,0,1,0) basically report bombing will become more effective ? Is that fair ?]
[tweet: 996464017978941441, from: @devin_crow (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:55:09(LOW,0,0,0) wow, what stupid logic]
[tweet: 996432673915789312, from: @sevens_2 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:50:36(LOW,0,0,0) The three of them are just playing hard to get.]
[tweet: 996429150264217601, from: @the_f_m (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:36:36(LOW,0,0,0) "Let’s call this Twitter purgatory. “That kind of makes me cringe,” a spokesperson said."]
[tweet: 996429815803793408, from: @digitalpsyche (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:39:15(LOW,1,6,2) “If you send the same message to four people, and two of them blocked you, and one reported you, we could assume without ever seeing what the content of the message was, that was generally a negative interaction.”  Yes, negative as in you disagreed. This WILL be abused.]
[tweet: 996449197271519232, from: @phiniaste (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:56:16(LOW,0,2,1) I see great potential to punish my enemies]
[tweet: 996453565982887936, from: @uncle_ickle (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:13:37(LOW,1,1,0) All such systems are prone to gaming by clever users. Apparently you didn't bother to ask what they were going to do to prevent gaming the system ... disappointing. Twitter will now become a block/report warzone until they figure out something else or abandon the model entirely.]
[tweet: 996450613083897856, from: @judybalda (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:01:53(LOW,0,0,0) Twitter trolls & bots are the same? Is there actually a way that ppl can make it a bot program that’s similar to robo calls? For instance, twitter bot can hit conversations like 5 every 10 seconds? Thnx if anyone knows.]
[tweet: 996446567534968832, from: @phxgop (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:45:49(LOW,0,1,0) Did you ask Del what he will do about David Brock trolls, and other liberal trolls, falsely mass reporting conservative accounts as “abusive”?]

totalReplies=93

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp
 ranking=19.84569889093748 from {coleman=0.48, smog=0.30, jac=0.50, kincaid=0.20, jrw=0.50, pop=6.18, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.10, ari=0.27, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=1.00, fuzzy=6.05, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1
What if the content was accurate and politely articulated, but created a negative reaction because people don't like hearing the truth?

This is an awful algorithm. This will just forward confirmation bias and exasperate the existing echo chambers.
 ranking=17.75883414823346 from {coleman=0.81, cos=0, smog=1.19, kincaid=0.47, pop=4.16, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.50, ari=0.52, lix=0.10, time=1.94, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.68}
 orders: orig=17, rank=2, date=2
Twitter needs to go back to the basics and restructure their reporting process. Tough words in Oct. & still no changes. Reports continuously ignored or consequences minimal. Users of twitter work harder to remove racism than twitter itself. What say u @jack??
 ranking=16.406848941908464 from {pop=1.39, coleman=0.72, numsent=5.00, flesch=1.37, cos=1.09, smog=0.85, ari=0.34, lix=0.06, time=0.88, numword=4.00, kincaid=0.32, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=9, rank=3, date=19
“If you send the same message to four people, and two of them blocked you, and one reported you, we could assume without ever seeing what the content of the message was, that was generally a negative interaction.”

Yes, negative as in you disagreed. This WILL be abused.
 ranking=15.903371981901879 from {coleman=0.51, cos=0, smog=0.93, kincaid=0.34, pop=3.22, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.26, ari=0.37, lix=0.06, time=1.63, numword=4.00, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.49}
 orders: orig=28, rank=4, date=7
Ha ha ha what could go wrong. Zero potential for unintended consequences here right? We have block and mute buttons its all the perpetually offended need. @Twitter stop trying to police thought it cant be done.
 ranking=14.927237130577172 from {pop=3.14, coleman=0.58, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.16, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.24, lix=0, time=1.38, numword=3.00, kincaid=0.18, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=16, rank=5, date=11
Do you think this introduces the opportunity for mischief? Say like if people gang up and block/mute/report an account they don’t like?
 ranking=14.4647877588175 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.24, pop=4.71, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.22, ari=0.24, lix=0, time=1.88, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=3, rank=6, date=3
It’ll be a mess. Love Del but ... how can there be a coherent conversation when some voices are randomly muted. Twitter has a knack for finding the worst possible “solution” to complicated problems
 ranking=14.222392134925123 from {coleman=0.61, cos=0.73, smog=0.93, kincaid=0.30, pop=2.71, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.28, ari=0.31, lix=0.06, time=0.63, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.46}
 orders: orig=5, rank=7, date=23
All such systems are prone to gaming by clever users. Apparently you didn't bother to ask what they were going to do to prevent gaming the system ... disappointing. Twitter will now become a block/report warzone until they figure out something else or abandon the model entirely.
 ranking=14.195232677860844 from {coleman=0.61, cos=0.30, smog=1.01, kincaid=0.43, pop=1.61, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.41, ari=0.41, lix=0.05, time=0.75, numword=4.00, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.52}
 orders: orig=30, rank=8, date=21
I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory." 
Twitter is... not calling it that. 
https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O
 ranking=14.178195020287205 from {coleman=0.73, cos=0.91, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.27, pop=5.56, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.33, ari=0.30, lix=0.11, time=0.69, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=2, rank=9, date=22
That's a legit concern, but note that they're applying this tool to a whole account based on all its interactions, not just a single tweet. So you'd have to be generating overwhelmingly negative responses with almost everything you tweet.
 ranking=14.027805097608956 from {coleman=0.67, cos=0, smog=1.25, kincaid=0.51, pop=2.20, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.45, ari=0.54, lix=0.07, time=1.25, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.69}
 orders: orig=18, rank=10, date=13
so let's get this straight, if a Jewish woman gets blocked by five nazis and two nazis also report her, the robit will assume she is, in fact, the baddie?https://twitter.com/WillOremus/status/996422627517321216 …
 ranking=13.464550633675795 from {coleman=0.38, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.52, pop=4.57, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.28, ari=0.59, lix=0.05, time=1.00, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=11, rank=11, date=17
Exactly. This is why the bot crackdown. Unfortunately I doubt it was all that effective.
 ranking=12.751229268902316 from {pop=3.00, coleman=0.60, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.28, cos=0.62, smog=0.75, ari=0.17, lix=0, time=1.75, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.22, fog=0.37}
 orders: orig=4, rank=12, date=5
Twitter trolls & bots are the same? Is there actually a way that ppl can make it a bot program that’s similar to robo calls? For instance, twitter bot can hit conversations like 5 every 10 seconds? Thnx if anyone knows. 
 ranking=12.626416970151876 from {coleman=0.47, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.16, cos=0.57, smog=0.69, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.06, numword=4.00, kincaid=0.20, fog=0.30}
 orders: orig=31, rank=13, date=16
So,  before,  blocking a user was an act of control over what you experienced.  Now it is an act of control over what everyone else experiences.
 ranking=12.04404310748058 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0, smog=0.97, kincaid=0.38, pop=2.64, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.37, ari=0.27, lix=0.05, time=0.50, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.90, fog=0.49}
 orders: orig=20, rank=14, date=25
Did you ask Del what he will do about David Brock trolls, and other liberal trolls, falsely mass reporting conservative accounts as “abusive”?
 ranking=11.17195884648882 from {coleman=0.68, cos=0.39, smog=1.40, kincaid=0.62, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.53, ari=0.68, lix=0.09, time=1.19, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.81}
 orders: orig=32, rank=15, date=14
This will have no drawbacks whatsoever
 ranking=10.898667050564885 from {coleman=0.83, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.22, pop=3.64, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.26, ari=0.37, lix=0.06, time=1.81, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.45}
 orders: orig=7, rank=16, date=4
Twitter should stop fucking interfering, every change they make, makes twitter worse.
 ranking=10.88165931290236 from {coleman=0.95, cos=0.87, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.44, pop=1.39, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.46, ari=0.62, lix=0.08, time=1.31, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=22, rank=17, date=12
so if I register a million sockpuppets just to block my enemies, I'll be the queen of twitter!
 ranking=10.877492777079759 from {pop=3.53, coleman=0.44, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.35, cos=0.53, smog=1.25, ari=0.34, lix=0.08, time=0.25, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.42, fog=0.69}
 orders: orig=12, rank=18, date=29
This is by proportion, right?

So it would be harder to discredit an account with 1,000 followers that has lots of tweets and shares, etc. then say an account with 15 followers and 2 tweets?
 ranking=10.595085516468094 from {pop=0.69, coleman=0.43, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.24, cos=0, smog=1.07, ari=0.35, lix=0.05, time=0.81, numword=3.00, kincaid=0.36, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=19, rank=19, date=20
"Let’s call this Twitter purgatory. “That kind of makes me cringe,” a spokesperson said."
 ranking=9.308656898164507 from {coleman=0.66, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.30, cos=0.57, smog=0.85, ari=0.25, lix=0, time=1.69, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.25, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.44}
 orders: orig=27, rank=20, date=6
empowering trolls, it's not like all blocks/reports are in good faith
 ranking=9.138045608081315 from {pop=2.40, coleman=0.52, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.15, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.20, lix=0, time=1.44, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.18, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=13, rank=21, date=10
basically report bombing will become more effective ? Is that fair ?
 ranking=8.948439738065112 from {pop=0.69, coleman=0.83, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.42, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.35, lix=0.05, time=0.94, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.32, fog=0.50}
 orders: orig=24, rank=22, date=18
I see great potential to punish my enemies
 ranking=8.536902496577703 from {coleman=0.50, cos=0, smog=1.07, kincaid=0.34, pop=2.20, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.39, ari=0.16, lix=0, time=1.13, numword=0, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.66}
 orders: orig=29, rank=23, date=15
So in other words, tweets that generate lots of approvals and hearts from the amen chorus are OK. Those that provoke angry resentment and consternation are bad.
 ranking=8.530695743315558 from {coleman=0.64, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.32, cos=0, smog=1.07, ari=0.41, lix=0, time=0.06, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.36, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=10, rank=24, date=32
Yeah we just went through a stint where two people in a thread months old were shadowbanned and it was total pain in the a...
 ranking=8.02618373806511 from {pop=0.69, coleman=0.36, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.13, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.48, lix=0, time=0.56, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.37, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=6, rank=25, date=24
Or you could just, I dunno, hire people to review content and determine if it's harmful based on context.
 ranking=6.110897557505165 from {coleman=0.52, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.24, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.43, lix=0.06, time=0.19, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.36, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=15, rank=26, date=30
but what if you are sending geraldos to @elongreen
 ranking=5.778848168625057 from {pop=1.39, coleman=0.39, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.18, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.07, lix=0, time=0.31, numword=0, kincaid=0.19, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=8, rank=27, date=28
The three of them are just playing hard to get.
 ranking=5.296635 from {coleman=0.30, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.88, cos=0, smog=0.30, ari=0.05, lix=0, time=1.56, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.01, fog=0.20}
 orders: orig=26, rank=28, date=8
Sooooooooo...
Shadowbanning then.
 ranking=5.206637181847354 from {coleman=1.86, cos=0, smog=0.69, fww=-5, kincaid=0.43, pop=0.69, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.64, ari=1.09, lix=0.99, time=0.13, numword=0, fog=0.70}
 orders: orig=23, rank=29, date=31
Reported
 ranking=3.535297180559945 from {coleman=1.57, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.42, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.63, ari=0.84, lix=0.99, time=0.38, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=14, rank=30, date=27
Begun, the blocking wars have.
 ranking=2.2154945773362194 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.14, pop=2.20, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.17, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.50, numword=0, fog=0.10}
 orders: orig=21, rank=31, date=9
wow, what stupid logic
 ranking=-0.9342874999999999 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.18, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.24, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.44, numword=0, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=25, rank=32, date=26

totalRepliesActual=89

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996422627517321216, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:10:41(HIGH,58,78,31) I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp]
[tweet: 996453844937666560, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:14:44(HIGH,31,69,6) I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory."  Twitter is... not calling it that.  https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O]
[tweet: 996426362280923136, from: @mims (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:25:32(HIGH,1,23,2) RIP your mentions]
[tweet: 996426538152222720, from: @caseynewton (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:26:14(HIGH,1,27,2) the new ‘RIP your mentions’ is that your mentions are dead because no one is in your mentions … and i’m loving it]
[tweet: 996436106710257666, from: @mims (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:04:15(HIGH,2,4,1) I would definitely say more on twitter if this actually worked but my critics are so subtle in their invective that I'm thinking not]
[tweet: 996440100836814850, from: @benedictevans (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:20:07(HIGH,1,9,1) “this is better than your usual work, but of course that’s so easy for you”]
[tweet: 996440577838268416, from: @chrisalbon (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:22:01(HIGH,1,5,1) “Read the article a few times. This is a really important piece for nobody”]
[tweet: 996492292310515712, from: @erikseaberg (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:47:31(HIGH,0,0,1) Check with your followers, if you have any.]
[tweet: 996493650472267776, from: @chrisalbon (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:52:54(HIGH,0,1,0) Bots mostly]
[tweet: 996424828625170432, from: @bloodrust88 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:19:26(HIGH,7,66,7) it sounds like a popularity contest. what if the "bad" guys all block and report a "good" guy with no reasonable justification just to attack, will the "good" person's account now be labeled as "detracting from the conversation"?]
[tweet: 996429636245557251, from: @peacefulyogini8 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:38:32(HIGH,1,13,0) Sure sounds like it]
[tweet: 996428852640567296, from: @jd2319 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:35:25(HIGH,4,45,2) Do we get a choice? Can we set our account prefs to "show me everything, not just what YOU think is worth seeing"?]
[tweet: 996457443755376642, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:29:02(HIGH,8,13,1) Yes, you do get a choice. "Show more replies" in a conversation, and "Show everything" in search settings.pic.twitter.com/fWlnBH9NS3]
[tweet: 996423885129121792, from: @arrapeachykeen (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:15:41(HIGH,0,0,1) @swanye_west @SolSuperstar goodbye my friends]
[tweet: 996427907298971648, from: @solsuperstar (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:31:40(HIGH,2,7,1) They’re trying to silence us]
[tweet: 996471617810186240, from: @sonyaellenmann (VERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:25:21(HIGH,2,10,0) Not even a joke, they literally are]
[tweet: 996436577437003776, from: @rampcapitalllc (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:06:07(HIGH,1,14,1) R.I.P. to your menchies @ComfortablySmug]
[tweet: 996432354636902402, from: @blythescherrer (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:49:20(HIGH,3,12,0) So basically anyone can now get fratted off the platform essentially.]
[tweet: 996427663601557504, from: @drahcir_rahl (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:30:42(HIGH,0,7,0) WTAF some of the fun of using twitter is the trolls.]
[tweet: 996427263242518528, from: @dekal35 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:29:06(HIGH,4,28,2) What will be interesting is how bots will be weaponized to incorrectly flag and help mute an individual who did nothing wrong. An ambitious but potentially disruptive plan $TWTR... best of luck.]
[tweet: 996429732743991299, from: @deancollins (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:38:55(HIGH,3,5,0) So....censorship at Twitter is the plan moving forward.]
[tweet: 996443641156653057, from: @pandasquiish (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:34:11(HIGH,0,4,0) Twiiter is pants, facebook ruleszzzz! bananas make great taxis. i like eating jelly. Can you read this tweet? i guess this comment made it through the "detractor spotter" victory for mankind Vs machines.]
[tweet: 996439220829982721, from: @musondachimba (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:16:37(HIGH,0,4,0) And who is to decide?   Anyway, #iVoteBTSBBMAs  @BTS_twt]
[tweet: 996433034156093440, from: @jesseheartthrob (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:52:02(HIGH,0,3,0) @mikeservito im screwed]
[tweet: 996443211773038592, from: @sansmerci86 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:32:29(HIGH,0,0,1) That is freaking awesome!]
[tweet: 996457785528270848, from: @potsiwbtd (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:30:24(HIGH,0,4,0) Yea, this def won't be used against dissenting voices]
[tweet: 996421406329069568, from: @thermostat (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:05:50(HIGH,2,7,0) https://xkcd.com/810/ ]
[tweet: 996544943459110912, from: @kenputski (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 05:16:44(HIGH,0,1,0) Fuck this.]
[tweet: 996517559229997057, from: @fiercely_ (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:27:55(HIGH,0,1,0) So similar to today’s Shadowbanning?]
[tweet: 996486935802621952, from: @halle2017 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:26:13(HIGH,0,0,0) Why?  It is free speech, and we can find out who the trolls are by their words, and b l o c k them.]
[tweet: 996481905011904513, from: @fgcjihadi (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:06:14(HIGH,0,0,0) "Twitter censorship is moving forward."]
[tweet: 996481085428195329, from: @sheindie (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:02:59(HIGH,1,0,0) . already throttled and previously shadowboxed ~ twitter.  also called 'russian bot']
[tweet: 996463884872675328, from: @thepixelsuite (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:54:38(HIGH,1,0,0) Oh no. How will the president talk to the press?]
[tweet: 996451435272462336, from: @emperoraxe (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:05:09(HIGH,0,0,0) Your bots will never stop us]
[tweet: 996428463987986432, from: @gamalielbaer (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:33:53(HIGH,1,0,0) Keep in mind that the efforts for #AI are alive from every big company, including $twtr. Our brains work this way too. We automatically disregard information that we know is useless to us.  If $twtr can pull this off, the content on @twitter becomes more valuable to humanity.]
[tweet: 996525169949659136, from: @hengavalli (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:58:09(HIGH,0,0,0) As long as U know it has no objectives..]
[tweet: 996525131722907648, from: @redsynergy2k (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:58:00(HIGH,0,0,0) pic.twitter.com/pZSdvQ5T0x]
[tweet: 996524025642795013, from: @naposapo81 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:53:36(HIGH,0,0,0) I wish they'd do something about the incessant spam threads. ie, when the Prez tweets it's followed by some damn troll that takes up 10+ threads w/ memes]
[tweet: 996520032636153856, from: @yerdagaming (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:37:44(HIGH,0,0,0) Ahem]
[tweet: 996516209423278083, from: @welshmarc (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:22:33(HIGH,0,0,0) There's one!pic.twitter.com/TIDcAlTISQ]
[tweet: 996510314026979331, from: @esptrades (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:59:07(HIGH,0,0,0) A search for $TSLA will now yield blank results.]
[tweet: 996475165654552576, from: @jhkiley (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:39:27(HIGH,0,0,0) Can we also get this as a Slack plugin?]
[tweet: 996428412423168003, from: @pandavova (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:33:40(HIGH,0,0,0) rip me]
[tweet: 996422310218186753, from: @scottstweetstr1 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:09:26(HIGH,0,0,0) yeah sure....pic.twitter.com/7qjmWE0mi6]
[tweet: 996425774029791234, from: @xhertx (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:23:11(HIGH,3,8,1) Smells like censorship... depending on whose opinion they agree with...]
[tweet: 996428982085025792, from: @yuusharo (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:35:56(HIGH,0,0,1) They literally say they are not looking at the content of the tweet. You’d know that if you read the article before commenting on it…]
[tweet: 996430662285570049, from: @xhertx (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:42:37(HIGH,0,4,1) I did read it ahole and I stand by my orig. statement ...]
[tweet: 996465785508892673, from: @therealjoshudan (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:02:11(HIGH,0,0,1) Interesting; a way to curtail threadjacking and shitposting sounds like a good idea to me]
[tweet: 996436809914593280, from: @shannondpitts2 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:07:03(HIGH,2,4,0) What's their definition of "detract"? Does this mean that those who disagree with certain views will suddenly be shadow-banned? How long has this already been going on?]
[tweet: 996432624011882496, from: @gregzink (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:50:25(HIGH,0,3,0) We’ve seen this skullduggery already. We all heard the guy describing shadowbanning tricks. Facebook has neither explained themselves nor been penalized. Ham radio jamming of perspectives contrary to the desired narrative is already becoming normalized. Did you get my tweet?]
[tweet: 996427065183358976, from: @chrismarino_nj (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:28:19(HIGH,1,4,0) new?  Twitter has been shadow banning since 2016]
[tweet: 996422615882457088, from: @mattflammable (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:10:38(HIGH,0,3,0) Be interested to see what data points are used to identify a troll.]
[tweet: 996451308633821184, from: @tillman_40 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:04:39(HIGH,0,1,0) @cspanwj another brick of free speech taken out @thebestcloser]
[tweet: 996440784399319040, from: @harleysask (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:22:50(HIGH,1,1,0) Censorship]
[tweet: 996432416779616256, from: @kcmeyer6971 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:49:35(HIGH,1,1,0) Digital version of a Heckler's veto.]
[tweet: 996540431965016064, from: @ennndeee (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:58:48(HIGH,0,0,0) Lol]
[tweet: 996524159629971457, from: @keithfhamilton (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:54:08(HIGH,0,0,0) pic.twitter.com/7LIHHyKyFv]
[tweet: 996521426256629760, from: @thekat0711 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:43:17(HIGH,0,0,0) I’ve been noticing tweets not showing]
[tweet: 996521265371406336, from: @johnjones9696 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:42:38(HIGH,0,0,0) In other words, if you are not a sheep that preaches liberalism you will be silenced from the conversation. Got it @realDonaldTrump]
[tweet: 996480199532277760, from: @lightlysaltedjc (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:59:27(HIGH,0,0,0) BREAKING: Twitter goes dark!]
[tweet: 996470634514407425, from: @amgpdel (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:21:27(HIGH,0,0,0) Behavior based content evaluation is not content evaluation. What if someone with an unpopular opinion is worth hearing? Needs a more robust appeals policy.   Examples: Malcolm X. Darwin. Galileo. Jesus.]
[tweet: 996437449566965760, from: @shannondpitts2 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:09:35(HIGH,0,0,0) Seems like yet another reason on the stack to switch to @getongab]
[tweet: 996436507077431296, from: @iancharboneau (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:05:50(HIGH,0,0,0) Now twitter works just like college rewarding conformity]
[tweet: 996436169079578625, from: @p8riot (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:04:30(HIGH,0,0,0) If this software doesn’t clean up the hate brigade, constantly posting at Governor Walker, then it is useless.]
[tweet: 996436012082458624, from: @john_de_vashon (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:03:52(HIGH,0,0,0) That would be something like this? Got me @Twitter timed-out for 24 hours.  Seems like "suppress political speech" is more like it.  Oh. That's right.  It's the f-word that @TwitterSafety @TwitterSupport @TwitterMoments @verified @Twitter @jack @biz @ev are sooo sensitive about.pic.twitter.com/7yYLpOGnWf]
[tweet: 996432289289519104, from: @larryrosenthal (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:49:05(HIGH,0,0,0) Galileo, Galileo, ....]
[tweet: 996431705169948672, from: @arthurboreman (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:46:45(HIGH,0,0,0) pic.twitter.com/Y6bdmOL457]
[tweet: 996425526976962560, from: @johnhime (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:22:12(HIGH,0,0,0) pic.twitter.com/VKt3CAE9OZ]
[tweet: 996428404147867648, from: @woadscrivened (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:33:38(HIGH,0,5,1) Just what Twitter needed - more censorship]
[tweet: 996516697199656960, from: @bdragon74 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:24:29(HIGH,0,3,1) And yet @sporkboot is STILL showing up in my notifications somehow! You already have shadowbans! Use them! Preferably with minimal discretion!]
[tweet: 996450137022058496, from: @jimni27 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:00:00(LOW,1,0,1) Shorter twitter: were going to censor conservatives even more.]
[tweet: 996430853168336896, from: @patchoulijim (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:43:22(LOW,0,5,0) BRILLIANT! What could possibly go wrong?]
[tweet: 996444137481293825, from: @infobee (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:36:10(LOW,0,4,0) Will the person even be notified? Hasn’t this been going on for awhile?  What’s the difference between this and shadow banning?]
[tweet: 996462122212167680, from: @arjanomics (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:47:37(LOW,1,2,0) Sounds like shadow banning]
[tweet: 996446363570327552, from: @r_love317 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:45:00(LOW,2,0,0) Translation: Twitter to begin blocking tweets challenging Marxist Progressivism or Islam.]
[tweet: 996436089433833473, from: @filthyanalyst (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:04:11(LOW,0,2,0) Hello, hello is there anybody out there?]
[tweet: 996434383363067905, from: @bgamron (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:57:24(LOW,2,0,0) Fuc* you @jack]
[tweet: 996483173402980358, from: @swagalina420 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 01:11:16(LOW,1,1,0) Sounds like bad news Few steps away from thought policing anyone who doesnt post the party's memes]
[tweet: 996470399893258240, from: @i_aver (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 12:20:31(LOW,1,0,0) The material authority found to “detract from the conversation” used to be eliminated much more openly and transparently.pic.twitter.com/qTdg7TpIQd]
[tweet: 996461086571249664, from: @kurvballs5 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 11:43:31(LOW,1,0,0) Oh good. Twitter is going to start being the thought police.]
[tweet: 996436285299593216, from: @shablon31 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 10:04:57(LOW,0,1,0) You mean twitter will start hiding anti Trump stuff, and allow Trump crap?]
[tweet: 996432624464875520, from: @pronaif (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:50:25(LOW,0,0,0) Here's @Jack at DisruptSF. Disruption for me but not for thee!https://youtu.be/J-y8TcHT8Lg ]
[tweet: 996421543889551366, from: @stone3u66ha (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 09:06:23(LOW,0,1,0) a good way to censor also, no?!]
[tweet: 996534584241262593, from: @midasrex1998 (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:35:34(LOW,0,0,0) So the shadowbanning won't be in secret any longer.  Got it.]
[tweet: 996533973890289664, from: @kurtisbacks (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:33:08(LOW,0,0,0) Just do it to people who get ratioed frequently.]
[tweet: 996526220266192901, from: @matthew_meadows (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 04:02:20(LOW,0,0,0) @TwitterSafety is an oxymoron.  @TwitterSupport is the most easily weaponised bot on the planet.  They're the two main ways people abuse the platform.  Hate swarms of snowflakes already rule here.]
[tweet: 996516191656136707, from: @perchyhenry (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:22:29(LOW,0,0,0) This isnt scary or anything.]
[tweet: 996512793988771840, from: @khe_ke_lunga (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 03:08:59(LOW,0,0,0) Nah, it depends which ecosystem you belong to!pic.twitter.com/G8gSq3W2Kx]
[tweet: 996506019881615360, from: @mafmichael (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/15/18 02:42:03(LOW,0,0,0) just when you thought cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias were peaking!]

totalReplies=93

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
it sounds like a popularity contest. what if the "bad" guys all block and report a "good" guy with no reasonable justification just to attack, will the "good" person's account now be labeled as "detracting from the conversation"?
 ranking=19.942863931391262 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0.42, smog=1.52, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.83, pop=5.24, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.59, ari=0.95, lix=0.99, time=1.87, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=1.01}
 orders: orig=10, rank=1, date=7
We’ve seen this skullduggery already. We all heard the guy describing shadowbanning tricks. Facebook has neither explained themselves nor been penalized. Ham radio jamming of perspectives contrary to the desired narrative is already becoming normalized. Did you get my tweet?
 ranking=18.502940860451677 from {coleman=0.92, cos=0, smog=1.07, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.40, pop=1.79, numsent=5.00, flesch=1.49, ari=0.49, lix=0.10, time=1.37, numword=4.00, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.67}
 orders: orig=50, rank=2, date=29
What will be interesting is how bots will be weaponized to incorrectly flag and help mute an individual who did nothing wrong. An ambitious but potentially disruptive plan $TWTR... best of luck.
 ranking=16.760359530324337 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0, smog=1.32, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.44, pop=4.36, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.40, ari=0.48, lix=0.07, time=1.73, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.76}
 orders: orig=20, rank=3, date=13
Behavior based content evaluation is not content evaluation. What if someone with an unpopular opinion is worth hearing? Needs a more robust appeals policy. 

Examples: Malcolm X. Darwin. Galileo. Jesus.
 ranking=16.542188184190774 from {coleman=0.82, cos=0, smog=0.81, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.41, numsent=7.00, flesch=1.55, ari=0.32, lix=0.08, time=0.65, numword=3.00, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.49}
 orders: orig=61, rank=4, date=61
Keep in mind that the efforts for #AI are alive from every big company, including $twtr. Our brains work this way too. We automatically disregard information that we know is useless to us.  If $twtr can pull this off, the content on @twitter becomes more valuable to humanity.
 ranking=16.04856337628969 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=1.02, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.33, pop=1.10, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.32, ari=0.27, lix=0.05, time=1.62, numword=4.00, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.54}
 orders: orig=35, rank=5, date=18
And yet @sporkboot is STILL showing up in my notifications somehow!
You already have shadowbans! Use them! Preferably with minimal discretion!
 ranking=15.030503752199106 from {coleman=0.80, cos=0.30, smog=0.97, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.38, pop=2.40, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.51, ari=0.33, lix=0.08, time=0.31, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.70}
 orders: orig=70, rank=6, date=76
I'm calling this new feature "Twitter purgatory." 
Twitter is... not calling it that. 
https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/Xf8ELwNn1O
 ranking=14.895005116500696 from {coleman=0.73, cos=0.90, smog=0.69, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.27, pop=5.56, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.33, ari=0.30, lix=0.11, time=0.83, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=2, rank=7, date=53
Twiiter is pants, facebook ruleszzzz! bananas make great taxis. i like eating jelly. Can you read this tweet? i guess this comment made it through the "detractor spotter" victory for mankind Vs machines.
 ranking=14.467496006743737 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.26, pop=2.08, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.27, ari=0.30, lix=0.07, time=0.97, numword=3.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=22, rank=8, date=47
I would definitely say more on twitter if this actually worked but my critics are so subtle in their invective that I'm thinking not
 ranking=13.875572356050537 from {coleman=0.57, cos=0.35, smog=1.07, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.49, pop=2.94, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.34, ari=0.59, lix=0.09, time=1.24, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.10, fog=0.63}
 orders: orig=5, rank=9, date=35
Do we get a choice? Can we set our account prefs to "show me everything, not just what YOU think is worth seeing"?
 ranking=13.817893041284668 from {coleman=0.32, cos=0, smog=0.69, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.14, pop=4.72, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.04, ari=0.11, lix=0, time=1.60, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.32}
 orders: orig=12, rank=10, date=19
I talked with Twitter VP Del Harvey about how exactly this will work. https://slate.com/technology/2018/05/twitter-will-start-hiding-tweets-that-detract-from-the-conversation.html …pic.twitter.com/iomIlH0Sqp
 ranking=13.783775723497273 from {coleman=0.48, cos=0.38, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.20, pop=6.18, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.10, ari=0.27, lix=0, time=1.91, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=1, rank=11, date=5
That would be something like this? Got me @Twitter timed-out for 24 hours.

Seems like "suppress political speech" is more like it.

Oh. That's right.

It's the f-word that @TwitterSafety @TwitterSupport @TwitterMoments @verified @Twitter @jack @biz @ev are sooo sensitive about.pic.twitter.com/7yYLpOGnWf
 ranking=13.614933877691902 from {coleman=0.55, numsent=6.00, flesch=1.14, cos=0, smog=0.69, ari=0.13, lix=0, time=1.28, numword=3.00, jac=0.40, kincaid=0.12, fog=0.30}
 orders: orig=65, rank=12, date=33
Smells like censorship... depending on whose opinion they agree with...
 ranking=13.432840398813791 from {coleman=0.86, cos=0, smog=1.25, kincaid=0.36, pop=3.40, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.39, ari=0.50, lix=0.06, time=1.82, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.80}
 orders: orig=45, rank=13, date=9
the new ‘RIP your mentions’ is that your mentions are dead because no one is in your mentions … and i’m loving it
 ranking=13.28867047446551 from {coleman=0.40, cos=0.27, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.36, pop=4.20, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.19, ari=0.41, lix=0.06, time=1.78, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.90, fog=0.42}
 orders: orig=4, rank=14, date=11
Translation: Twitter to begin blocking tweets challenging Marxist Progressivism or Islam.
 ranking=13.18824411218834 from {coleman=1.27, cos=0.67, smog=1.25, kincaid=0.67, pop=1.79, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.81, ari=0.85, lix=0.99, time=0.92, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.77}
 orders: orig=75, rank=15, date=49
What's their definition of "detract"? Does this mean that those who disagree with certain views will suddenly be shadow-banned? How long has this already been going on?
 ranking=13.023715934583407 from {coleman=0.60, cos=0, smog=0.62, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.16, pop=2.64, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.13, ari=0.25, lix=0, time=1.12, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.25}
 orders: orig=49, rank=16, date=40
Yes, you do get a choice. "Show more replies" in a conversation, and "Show everything" in search settings.pic.twitter.com/fWlnBH9NS3
 ranking=12.53569513711458 from {coleman=0.47, cos=0.60, smog=0.85, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.22, pop=4.01, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.21, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=0.81, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=13, rank=17, date=54
So basically anyone can now get fratted off the platform essentially.
 ranking=12.366075476877525 from {coleman=0.76, cos=0, smog=1.07, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.35, pop=3.50, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.35, ari=0.45, lix=0.08, time=1.42, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=18, rank=18, date=27
Will the person even be notified? Hasn’t this been going on for awhile?  What’s the difference between this and shadow banning?
 ranking=12.012793918380687 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0, smog=0.62, jac=0.45, kincaid=0.21, pop=2.08, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.24, ari=0.21, lix=0, time=0.94, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.23}
 orders: orig=73, rank=19, date=48
They literally say they are not looking at the content of the tweet. You’d know that if you read the article before commenting on it…
 ranking=11.750465011137766 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.24, pop=1.61, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.18, ari=0.23, lix=0, time=1.57, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.20, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=46, rank=20, date=20
. already throttled and previously shadowboxed ~ twitter.  also called 'russian bot'
 ranking=11.613511709431174 from {coleman=1.18, cos=0.33, smog=0.69, jac=0.43, kincaid=0.26, pop=1.10, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.34, ari=0.63, lix=0.99, time=0.56, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.30}
 orders: orig=32, rank=21, date=65
The material authority found to “detract from the conversation” used to be eliminated much more openly and transparently.pic.twitter.com/qTdg7TpIQd
 ranking=11.215003922735503 from {coleman=0.73, cos=0.33, smog=1.40, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.56, pop=1.10, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.55, ari=0.57, lix=0.08, time=0.67, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.81}
 orders: orig=79, rank=22, date=60
“Read the article a few times. This is a really important piece for nobody”
 ranking=10.849842243399731 from {coleman=0.45, cos=0, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.16, pop=2.89, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.15, ari=0.10, lix=0, time=1.03, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.10, fog=0.28}
 orders: orig=7, rank=23, date=44
Just what Twitter needed - more censorship
 ranking=10.796219106921983 from {coleman=0.93, cos=0.50, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.22, pop=2.71, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.26, ari=0.45, lix=0.06, time=1.66, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.45}
 orders: orig=69, rank=24, date=16
In other words, if you are not a sheep that preaches liberalism you will be silenced from the conversation. Got it
@realDonaldTrump
 ranking=10.671148279845587 from {coleman=0.50, cos=0.38, smog=0.85, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.27, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.25, ari=0.22, lix=0, time=0.25, numword=2.00, fuzzy=2.15, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=59, rank=25, date=79
Be interested to see what data points are used to identify a troll.
 ranking=10.425070265757071 from {coleman=0.43, cos=0.38, smog=1.07, kincaid=0.25, pop=1.79, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.17, ari=0.23, lix=0, time=1.93, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.57}
 orders: orig=52, rank=26, date=4
@TwitterSafety is an oxymoron.  @TwitterSupport is the most easily weaponised bot on the planet.  They're the two main ways people abuse the platform.  Hate swarms of snowflakes already rule here.
 ranking=10.41173499588335 from {coleman=0.56, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.22, cos=0, smog=0.77, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.11, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.20, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.36}
 orders: orig=86, rank=27, date=85
Interesting; a way to curtail threadjacking and shitposting sounds like a good idea to me
 ranking=10.241673757301093 from {coleman=0.66, cos=0, smog=1.25, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.42, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.38, ari=0.47, lix=0.07, time=0.70, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.70}
 orders: orig=48, rank=28, date=59
Censorship
 ranking=10.131546424995445 from {coleman=2.15, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=1.01, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=2.48, ari=1.31, lix=0.99, time=1.01, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=2.02}
 orders: orig=54, rank=29, date=45
Shorter twitter: were going to censor conservatives even more.
 ranking=9.96366101636547 from {coleman=0.91, cos=0.41, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.51, pop=2.08, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.62, ari=0.51, lix=0.07, time=0.90, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=71, rank=30, date=50
I did read it ahole and I stand by my orig. statement ...
 ranking=9.596894059161459 from {coleman=0.22, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.24, pop=2.56, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.18, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=1.51, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=47, rank=31, date=23
WTAF some of the fun of using twitter is the trolls.
 ranking=9.52568150733632 from {coleman=0.31, cos=0.89, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.13, pop=2.64, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.04, ari=0.08, lix=0, time=1.71, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.22}
 orders: orig=19, rank=32, date=14
Now twitter works just like college rewarding conformity
 ranking=9.433770635677453 from {coleman=1.01, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.49, cos=0.35, smog=1.07, ari=0.57, lix=0.99, time=1.17, numword=0, kincaid=0.41, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.66}
 orders: orig=63, rank=33, date=38
new?  Twitter has been shadow banning since 2016
 ranking=9.414663342490142 from {pop=2.40, coleman=0.65, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.14, cos=0.82, smog=0.30, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.75, numword=0, kincaid=0.11, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=51, rank=34, date=12
So....censorship at Twitter is the plan moving forward.
 ranking=9.291492462306847 from {coleman=0.51, cos=0.45, smog=0.30, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.20, pop=2.94, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.21, ari=0.15, lix=0.05, time=1.53, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.14}
 orders: orig=21, rank=35, date=22
“this is better than your usual work, but of course that’s so easy for you”
 ranking=9.259729884730952 from {coleman=0.30, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.17, pop=3.26, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.04, ari=0.15, lix=0, time=1.06, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.28}
 orders: orig=6, rank=36, date=43
If this software doesn’t clean up the hate brigade, constantly posting at Governor Walker, then it is useless.
 ranking=9.075280795701056 from {coleman=0.65, cos=0.33, smog=1.07, jac=0.47, kincaid=0.45, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.40, ari=0.50, lix=0.10, time=1.21, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=64, rank=37, date=36
Sounds like bad news
Few steps away from thought policing anyone who doesnt post the party's memes
 ranking=8.955780125636153 from {coleman=0.59, cos=0.28, smog=0.85, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.27, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.15, ari=0.43, lix=0, time=0.52, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.45}
 orders: orig=78, rank=38, date=67
BRILLIANT! What could possibly go wrong?
 ranking=8.779947827076443 from {coleman=0.83, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.07, pop=2.30, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.09, ari=0.30, lix=0.05, time=1.48, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.06}
 orders: orig=72, rank=39, date=24
just when you thought cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias were peaking!
 ranking=8.65143595382171 from {coleman=1.00, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.50, cos=0, smog=1.25, ari=0.64, lix=0.11, time=0.43, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.45, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.77}
 orders: orig=89, rank=40, date=71
I wish they'd do something about the incessant spam threads. ie, when the Prez tweets it's followed by some damn troll that takes up 10+ threads w/ memes
 ranking=8.628864735361718 from {coleman=0.51, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.30, cos=0.73, smog=1.07, ari=0.59, lix=0.08, time=0.20, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.49, fog=0.66}
 orders: orig=38, rank=41, date=81
Yea, this def won't be used against dissenting voices
 ranking=8.489262203117587 from {coleman=0.65, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.26, pop=2.08, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.28, ari=0.28, lix=0, time=0.79, numword=0, fuzzy=0.90, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=26, rank=42, date=55
Digital version of a Heckler's veto.
 ranking=8.31788889690556 from {coleman=0.45, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.26, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.34, ari=0.04, lix=0.08, time=1.39, numword=0, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.50}
 orders: orig=55, rank=43, date=28
And who is to decide? 

Anyway, #iVoteBTSBBMAs  @BTS_twt
 ranking=8.200163227073094 from {coleman=0.24, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.03, pop=2.08, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.00, ari=-0.12, lix=0, time=1.08, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.10}
 orders: orig=23, rank=44, date=42
Not even a joke, they literally are
 ranking=8.105354007244143 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.20, pop=3.26, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.21, ari=0.05, lix=0, time=0.63, numword=0, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.43}
 orders: orig=16, rank=45, date=62
You mean twitter will start hiding anti Trump stuff, and allow Trump crap?
 ranking=8.057460474186737 from {coleman=0.57, cos=0.29, smog=0.30, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.20, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.10, ari=0.34, lix=0, time=1.19, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.26}
 orders: orig=81, rank=46, date=37
Oh no. How will the president talk to the press?
 ranking=8.053081746884356 from {coleman=0.30, cos=0, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.03, pop=1.10, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.00, ari=-0.08, lix=0, time=0.72, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.30}
 orders: orig=33, rank=47, date=58
Oh good. Twitter is going to start being the thought police.
 ranking=7.9566376145884705 from {coleman=0.50, cos=0.38, smog=0.30, jac=0.41, kincaid=0.03, pop=1.10, numsent=2.00, flesch=0.99, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.76, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.11}
 orders: orig=80, rank=48, date=56
Here's @Jack at DisruptSF. Disruption for me but not for thee!https://youtu.be/J-y8TcHT8Lg 
 ranking=7.5957101635845365 from {coleman=0.49, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.11, cos=0, smog=0.69, ari=0.06, lix=0, time=1.35, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.09, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.31}
 orders: orig=82, rank=49, date=30
Hello, hello is there anybody out there?
 ranking=7.460479599202905 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.12, pop=1.39, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.09, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=1.26, numword=0, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.43}
 orders: orig=76, rank=50, date=34
Seems like yet another reason on the stack to switch to @getongab
 ranking=7.0382688802835105 from {coleman=0.41, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.12, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.17, lix=0, time=1.10, numword=1.00, kincaid=0.19, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=62, rank=51, date=41
So the shadowbanning won't be in secret any longer.  Got it.
 ranking=6.8785840649578205 from {coleman=0.45, cos=0, smog=0.69, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.20, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.25, ari=0.04, lix=0, time=0.07, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.30}
 orders: orig=84, rank=52, date=87
@cspanwj another brick of free speech taken out @thebestcloser
 ranking=6.790452803875705 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.20, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.21, ari=0.18, lix=0, time=0.88, numword=0, fuzzy=0.80, fog=0.43}
 orders: orig=53, rank=53, date=51
I’ve been noticing tweets not showing 
 ranking=6.659261927818386 from {coleman=0.86, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.34, cos=0.58, smog=0.85, ari=0.37, lix=0.08, time=0.22, numword=0, kincaid=0.26, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.50}
 orders: orig=58, rank=54, date=80
Why?  It is free speech, and we can find out who the trolls are by their words, and b l o c k them.
 ranking=6.631949784638535 from {coleman=0.08, numsent=2.00, flesch=0.90, cos=0.45, smog=0.30, ari=-0.07, lix=0, time=0.49, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.04, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.24}
 orders: orig=30, rank=55, date=68
Check with your followers, if you have any.
 ranking=6.514401832298817 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0, smog=0.85, kincaid=0.11, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.07, ari=0.13, lix=0, time=0.47, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=8, rank=56, date=69
a good way to censor also, no?!
 ranking=5.590710984733299 from {coleman=0.14, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.03, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.97, ari=-0.16, lix=0, time=1.98, numword=0, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.14}
 orders: orig=83, rank=57, date=2
Nah, it depends which ecosystem you belong to!pic.twitter.com/G8gSq3W2Kx
 ranking=5.552326279415279 from {coleman=0.57, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.39, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=0.22, lix=0, time=0.38, numword=0, kincaid=0.34, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=88, rank=58, date=73
A search for $TSLA will now yield blank results.
 ranking=5.239752823022387 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0.89, smog=0.30, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.04, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.96, ari=0.13, lix=0, time=0.40, numword=0, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.16}
 orders: orig=41, rank=59, date=72
RIP your mentions
 ranking=4.30450691956115 from {coleman=0.68, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.07, pop=4.08, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.09, ari=0.18, lix=0.05, time=1.80, numword=0, fog=0.06}
 orders: orig=3, rank=60, date=10
Your bots will never stop us
 ranking=4.299457584269663 from {coleman=0.34, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.98, cos=0, smog=0.30, ari=-0.02, lix=0, time=0.85, numword=0, kincaid=0.03, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.12}
 orders: orig=34, rank=61, date=52
"Twitter censorship is moving forward."
 ranking=4.289918400201795 from {coleman=1.09, cos=0.50, smog=0.85, fww=-5, jac=0.39, kincaid=0.50, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.67, ari=0.56, lix=0.99, time=0.54, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.50}
 orders: orig=31, rank=62, date=66
As long as U know it has no objectives..
 ranking=3.848592907068212 from {coleman=0.19, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.15, cos=0, smog=0.85, ari=-0.06, lix=0, time=0.13, numword=0, kincaid=0.18, fog=0.40}
 orders: orig=36, rank=63, date=84
So similar to today’s Shadowbanning?
 ranking=3.7700911812621025 from {coleman=0.98, cos=0, smog=1.07, fww=-5, kincaid=0.63, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.88, ari=0.44, lix=0.11, time=0.29, numword=0, fuzzy=0.60, fog=1.08}
 orders: orig=29, rank=64, date=77
Just do it to people who get ratioed frequently.
 ranking=3.7445931960049936 from {coleman=0.49, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.96, cos=0, smog=0.30, ari=0.17, lix=0, time=0.09, numword=0, kincaid=0.05, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.18}
 orders: orig=85, rank=65, date=86
Can we also get this as a Slack plugin?
 ranking=3.7314471285892634 from {coleman=0.19, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.96, cos=0, smog=0.30, ari=-0.06, lix=0, time=0.61, numword=0, kincaid=0.05, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.18}
 orders: orig=42, rank=66, date=63
That is freaking awesome!
 ranking=3.4406370148830865 from {coleman=0.76, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=0.33, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.45, ari=0.26, lix=0.11, time=0.99, numword=0, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=25, rank=67, date=46
They’re trying to silence us
 ranking=3.2409815832951665 from {coleman=0.46, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.04, pop=3.22, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.03, ari=0.03, lix=0, time=1.69, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=15, rank=68, date=15
Galileo, Galileo, ....
 ranking=3.1500772471910112 from {coleman=1.27, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.44, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.64, ari=0.63, lix=0.99, time=1.44, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=66, rank=69, date=26
https://xkcd.com/810/ 
 ranking=2.995732273553991 from {pop=3.00, coleman=0, numsent=1.00, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, time=2.00, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=27, rank=70, date=1
R.I.P. to your menchies @ComfortablySmug
 ranking=2.982136354186446 from {coleman=0.58, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.07, pop=3.58, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.09, ari=0.10, lix=0.05, time=1.15, numword=0, fog=0.06}
 orders: orig=17, rank=71, date=39
@swanye_west @SolSuperstar goodbye my friends
 ranking=2.9642950285389698 from {coleman=0.78, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.13, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.81, ari=0.26, lix=0.99, time=1.89, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.06}
 orders: orig=14, rank=72, date=6
Sure sounds like it 
 ranking=2.763070127739283 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.11, pop=3.37, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.82, ari=-0.03, lix=0, time=1.55, numword=0, fuzzy=0.40, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=11, rank=73, date=21
Sounds like shadow banning
 ranking=1.9781956827631788 from {coleman=0.90, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.18, pop=1.95, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.24, ari=0.38, lix=0, time=0.74, numword=0, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=74, rank=74, date=57
BREAKING: Twitter goes dark!
 ranking=0.8849821629213482 from {coleman=0.90, cos=0.50, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.18, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.24, ari=0.38, lix=0.11, time=0.58, numword=0, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=60, rank=75, date=64
@mikeservito im screwed
 ranking=0.8784771658572674 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.15, pop=1.79, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.80, ari=0.04, lix=0.10, time=1.33, numword=0, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=24, rank=76, date=31
This isnt scary or anything.
 ranking=0.31954311930291857 from {coleman=0.56, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=0.14, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.17, ari=0.14, lix=0, time=0.36, numword=0, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.50}
 orders: orig=87, rank=77, date=74
Fuc* you @jack
 ranking=0.1610052557449082 from {coleman=0.09, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.15, pop=1.79, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.80, ari=-0.32, lix=0, time=1.30, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=77, rank=78, date=32
Bots mostly
 ranking=-0.33153961719286407 from {coleman=0.68, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.15, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.80, ari=0.16, lix=0, time=0.45, numword=0, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=9, rank=79, date=70
Ahem
 ranking=-0.7731870786516859 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.42, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.63, ari=-0.10, lix=0, time=0.27, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=39, rank=80, date=78
rip me
 ranking=-1.5586755617977524 from {coleman=-0.05, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.15, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.80, ari=-0.43, lix=0, time=1.64, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=43, rank=81, date=17
Fuck this.
 ranking=-1.6885059093276955 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.15, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.80, ari=-0.08, lix=0, time=0.02, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.04}
 orders: orig=28, rank=82, date=89
Lol
 ranking=-2.9639061797752815 from {coleman=0.09, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.17, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.79, ari=-0.34, lix=0, time=0.04, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=56, rank=83, date=88
yeah sure....pic.twitter.com/7qjmWE0mi6
 ranking=-9.823793820224719 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.17, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.79, ari=-0.10, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=1.96, numword=0, fuzzy=1.00, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=44, rank=84, date=3
pic.twitter.com/VKt3CAE9OZ
 ranking=-11.157303370786517 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=1.84, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=68, rank=85, date=8
pic.twitter.com/Y6bdmOL457
 ranking=-11.539325842696629 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=1.46, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=67, rank=86, date=25
There's one!pic.twitter.com/TIDcAlTISQ
 ranking=-12.471771348314606 from {coleman=0.09, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.17, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.79, ari=-0.34, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=0.34, numword=0, fuzzy=0.50, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=40, rank=87, date=75
pic.twitter.com/7LIHHyKyFv
 ranking=-12.820224719101123 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=0.18, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=57, rank=88, date=82
pic.twitter.com/pZSdvQ5T0x
 ranking=-12.842696629213483 from {coleman=0, numsent=0, flesch=2.00, smog=0, fww=-5, ari=0, lix=0, fwwp=-10, time=0.16, numword=0, kincaid=0, fog=0}
 orders: orig=37, rank=89, date=83

totalRepliesActual=1

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996180578394259456, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 05:08:52, reply to 996180193894064133 from  (UNKNOWN,1,4,0) There was a good @sokane1 piece a few weeks ago on how Waymo and Tesla are taking completely different strategies for collecting the data to improve their systemshttps://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation …]

totalReplies=1

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
There was a good @sokane1 piece a few weeks ago on how Waymo and Tesla are taking completely different strategies for collecting the data to improve their systemshttps://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation …
 ranking=42.09703846473178 from {coleman=0.57, smog=1.40, jac=0.50, kincaid=0.54, jrw=0.50, pop=2.40, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.37, ari=0.67, lix=0.08, time=2.00, numword=2.00, fuzzy=28.25, fog=0.83}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1

totalRepliesActual=1

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996180578394259456, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 05:08:52(HIGH,1,4,0) There was a good @sokane1 piece a few weeks ago on how Waymo and Tesla are taking completely different strategies for collecting the data to improve their systemshttps://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation …]

totalReplies=1

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
There was a good @sokane1 piece a few weeks ago on how Waymo and Tesla are taking completely different strategies for collecting the data to improve their systemshttps://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation …
 ranking=14.42003791806066 from {coleman=0.57, cos=0.59, smog=1.40, jac=0.38, kincaid=0.54, pop=2.40, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.37, ari=0.67, lix=0.08, time=2.00, numword=2.00, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.83}
 orders: orig=1, rank=1, date=1

totalRepliesActual=14

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 996163057738043393, from: @yrechtman (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:59:15(HIGH,0,0,1) Ugh. That’s so lame (of him). I guess that’s the difference between a corporate blogger and an actual intellectual?]
[tweet: 996164015205240833, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 04:03:03(HIGH,0,0,1) He's not unintellectual. He's just rather thin-skinned for a person whose job is to go around remaking the economy by funding disruption.]
[tweet: 996204706329513985, from: @yrechtman (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 06:44:45(HIGH,0,0,0) I guess that’s the difference between being smart and being an intellectual. Welcoming debate is a key part. Also yes. Just super thin skinned]
[tweet: 996256353093070849, from: @can (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:09:58(HIGH,0,4,1) He blocked me too. Seemingly out of the blue, emailed him to see why. No response yet. Maybe we are on a list somewhere?]
[tweet: 996258236385972224, from: @susanthesquark (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:17:27(HIGH,0,1,1) He just unfollowed me too, right after commenting on one of my tweets. I'm not sure why? Maybe my NYT letter about Harris and co?]
[tweet: 996258757431656449, from: @can (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:19:32(HIGH,0,1,1) My best good faith guess is twitter refresh]
[tweet: 996259394068340738, from: @susanthesquark (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:22:03(HIGH,0,0,1) To be fair I've accidentally unfollowed people in the past and then awkwardly had to figure out when to re follow them. Never accuse blocked anyone tho]
[tweet: 996259503007059968, from: @susanthesquark (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:22:29(HIGH,0,0,1) * accidentally blocked]
[tweet: 996260105514569728, from: @can (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:24:53(HIGH,0,1,0) Yeah. His tweets are generally interesting, if a bit less than art fully worded at times. Oh well.]
[tweet: 996205996908331008, from: @antoniogm (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 06:49:52(HIGH,0,0,1) What was the trigger? Is he the new @pmarca merit badge?]
[tweet: 996252618002329600, from: @boomereng (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 09:55:08(HIGH,0,1,1) welcome to the club!]
[tweet: 996253612832522240, from: @antoniogm (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 09:59:05(HIGH,0,1,0) I think he's only muted me thus far. I'm a novitiate at best.]
[tweet: 996162964704018432, from: @tkane (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:58:53(HIGH,0,1,1) #slatepitch: VC snowflake rankings]
[tweet: 996263272650362880, from: @sekaifarai (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 10:37:28(HIGH,0,1,0) he’s loudly sensitive, ‘ey]

totalReplies=5

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
He's not unintellectual. He's just rather thin-skinned for a person whose job is to go around remaking the economy by funding disruption.
 ranking=14.736936076725426 from {coleman=0.67, cos=0.48, smog=1.07, jac=0.42, kincaid=0.43, pop=1.61, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.50, ari=0.33, lix=0.05, time=1.71, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.85, fog=0.61}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=3
He blocked me too. Seemingly out of the blue, emailed him to see why. No response yet. Maybe we are on a list somewhere?
 ranking=14.167502302880786 from {coleman=0.34, cos=0, smog=0.57, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.05, pop=2.56, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.01, ari=-0.02, lix=0, time=1.00, numword=2.00, fuzzy=2.00, fog=0.20}
 orders: orig=4, rank=2, date=8
To be fair I've accidentally unfollowed people in the past and then awkwardly had to figure out when to re follow them. Never accuse blocked anyone tho
 ranking=13.116127249474902 from {coleman=0.57, cos=0.22, smog=0.85, jac=0.46, kincaid=0.31, pop=1.61, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.27, ari=0.34, lix=0, time=0.57, numword=2.00, fuzzy=2.50, fog=0.41}
 orders: orig=7, rank=3, date=11
He just unfollowed me too, right after commenting on one of my tweets. I'm not sure why? Maybe my NYT letter about Harris and co?
 ranking=12.883597851698129 from {coleman=0.41, cos=0, smog=0.75, jac=0.40, kincaid=0.16, pop=1.95, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.14, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.86, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.80, fog=0.33}
 orders: orig=5, rank=4, date=9
I guess that’s the difference between being smart and being an intellectual. Welcoming debate is a key part. Also yes. Just super thin skinned
 ranking=12.461631633497307 from {coleman=0.62, cos=0, smog=0.77, jac=0.44, kincaid=0.18, numsent=4.00, flesch=1.20, ari=0.20, lix=0, time=1.57, numword=2.00, fuzzy=1.10, fog=0.38}
 orders: orig=3, rank=5, date=4
Ugh. That’s so lame (of him). I guess that’s the difference between a corporate blogger and an actual intellectual?
 ranking=12.300708229042908 from {coleman=0.60, cos=0, smog=0.85, jac=0.40, kincaid=0.27, pop=1.61, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.33, ari=0.18, lix=0.05, time=1.86, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.70, fog=0.47}
 orders: orig=1, rank=6, date=2
* accidentally blocked
 ranking=9.240606898510695 from {coleman=2.01, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=0.73, pop=1.61, numsent=1.00, flesch=2.07, ari=1.22, lix=0.99, time=0.43, numword=0, fuzzy=2.30, fog=1.04}
 orders: orig=8, rank=7, date=12
Yeah. His tweets are generally interesting, if a bit less than art fully worded at times. Oh well.
 ranking=8.863711172885301 from {coleman=0.47, cos=0, smog=0.75, jac=0.40, kincaid=0.12, pop=0.69, numsent=3.00, flesch=1.12, ari=0.09, lix=0, time=0.29, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.34}
 orders: orig=9, rank=8, date=13
I think he's only muted me thus far. I'm a novitiate at best.
 ranking=8.471184815795874 from {coleman=0.28, cos=0.34, smog=0.69, kincaid=0.03, pop=0.69, numsent=2.00, flesch=0.99, ari=-0.08, lix=0, time=1.14, numword=1.00, fuzzy=1.10, fog=0.29}
 orders: orig=12, rank=9, date=7
What was the trigger? Is he the new @pmarca merit badge?
 ranking=7.986079341005529 from {coleman=0.30, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.03, pop=1.61, numsent=2.00, flesch=1.00, ari=-0.08, lix=0, time=1.43, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.10}
 orders: orig=10, rank=10, date=5
 My best good faith guess is twitter refresh
 ranking=7.328027113341028 from {coleman=0.54, cos=0, smog=0.30, kincaid=0.11, pop=1.95, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.07, ari=0.19, lix=0, time=0.71, numword=0, fuzzy=1.30, fog=0.16}
 orders: orig=6, rank=11, date=10
#slatepitch: VC snowflake rankings
 ranking=7.1873452065604795 from {coleman=1.35, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=0.48, pop=1.95, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.66, ari=0.74, lix=0.99, time=2.00, numword=0, fuzzy=0.60, fog=0.58}
 orders: orig=13, rank=12, date=1
he’s loudly sensitive, ‘ey
 ranking=2.211610214255588 from {coleman=0.88, cos=0, smog=0.85, fww=-5, kincaid=0.26, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.37, ari=0.34, lix=0.05, time=0.14, numword=0, fuzzy=0.90, fog=0.73}
 orders: orig=14, rank=13, date=14
welcome to the club!
 ranking=1.3358369347695986 from {coleman=0.39, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.04, pop=1.95, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.03, ari=-0.03, lix=0, time=1.29, numword=0, fuzzy=0.30, fog=0.08}
 orders: orig=11, rank=14, date=6

totalRepliesActual=5

_sourcetweets=
[tweet: 995059524657528832, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/11/18 02:54:12(UNKNOWN,2,26,4) I guess in retrospect it never should have been a mystery why Andreessen blocks so many journalists on Twitter.http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/03/01/i_paid_20_to_ask_marc_andreessen_why_he_blocks_me_on_twitter.html …]
[tweet: 996159131433156609, from: @willoremus (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:43:39, reply to 995057583445557248 from  (UNKNOWN,1,6,3) There we go. Had a feeling it was only a matter of time...pic.twitter.com/tAzlmHBpXs]
[tweet: 996159569662562304, from: @dlberes (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:45:23(HIGH,0,2,0) congrats]
[tweet: 996162521450106882, from: @mcwm (VERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:57:07(HIGH,0,1,0) it's a good club]
[tweet: 996161890752516097, from: @andrewthesmart (NOTVERIFIED) on 05/14/18 03:54:37(HIGH,0,0,0) The weird part of the "AI has rights" argument is that then the companies who create the AI can no longer own it.]

totalReplies=12

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=
There we go. Had a feeling it was only a matter of time...pic.twitter.com/tAzlmHBpXs
 ranking=17.043389048328823 from {coleman=0.14, smog=0.30, jac=0.50, kincaid=0.03, jrw=0.50, pop=3.40, numsent=2.00, flesch=0.98, ari=-0.18, lix=0, time=1.60, numword=1.00, fuzzy=6.65, fog=0.12}
 orders: orig=2, rank=1, date=2
I guess in retrospect it never should have been a mystery why Andreessen blocks so many journalists on Twitter.http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/03/01/i_paid_20_to_ask_marc_andreessen_why_he_blocks_me_on_twitter.html …
 ranking=13.492700019476949 from {coleman=0.64, cos=0, smog=1.25, kincaid=0.46, pop=4.36, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.37, ari=0.54, lix=0.08, time=2.00, numword=1.00, fuzzy=0.10, fog=0.70}
 orders: orig=1, rank=2, date=1
The weird part of the "AI has rights" argument is that then the companies who create the AI can no longer own it.
 ranking=8.032103190980614 from {coleman=0.34, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.20, cos=0, smog=1.07, ari=0.40, lix=0, time=0.80, numword=2.00, kincaid=0.39, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.63}
 orders: orig=5, rank=3, date=4
congrats
 ranking=4.55344436111989 from {coleman=1.57, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=0.42, pop=1.39, numsent=1.00, flesch=1.63, ari=0.84, lix=0.99, time=1.20, numword=0, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.02}
 orders: orig=3, rank=4, date=3
it's a good club
 ranking=-1.866302819440055 from {coleman=0.09, cos=0, smog=0.30, fww=-5, kincaid=-0.13, pop=0.69, numsent=1.00, flesch=0.81, ari=-0.29, lix=0, time=0.40, numword=0, fuzzy=0.20, fog=0.06}
 orders: orig=4, rank=5, date=5

totalRepliesActual=0

_sourcetweets=


totalReplies=0

rankingFunctionName=formula1js

_rankedtweets=